On October 6, 2026, Category Labs — the team behind Monad — used its OPEN summit in Singapore to unveil a design called Private Settlement. The pitch: confidential execution on a public chain, without giving up access to that chain's shared liquidity. MON jumped on the news. The idea is also early — a published design, not a shipped product — so it's worth separating what's actually known from what's still speculation.
What Was Announced
Private Settlement describes encrypted execution domains that run on top of the public Monad L1. According to coverage of the announcement, the model works roughly like this:
- A domain is created through a standard EVM hub contract on Monad.
- Transactions and state inside that domain are encrypted — not visible the way a normal Monad transaction is.
- Monad's public validators still handle ordering and atomic settlement, so a domain isn't a separate chain; it settles into the same shared environment everyone else uses.
- Execution inside a domain depends on an attestation method — TEE, zkVM, or MPC — chosen by whoever creates the domain, rather than one fixed approach for the whole network.
That combination is the actual pitch: privacy for the parts of a trade that an institution doesn't want public, while still settling against Monad's broader liquidity instead of a walled-off private ledger.
What's Still Unknown
This is the part worth being direct about, because the public material so far is thin:
- No published threat model. Category Labs hasn't detailed what each attestation option (TEE, zkVM, MPC) actually protects against, or what the trust assumptions are for domain operators.
- No named design partners. Nothing has been confirmed about which institutions, if any, are building on this.
- No shipping timeline. The summit presentation introduced a design; it did not come with a launch date.
- Shared liquidity is still thin relative to the pitch. Monad's stablecoin base is in the hundreds of millions of dollars — a fraction of what's sitting on Ethereum. "Settle into shared liquidity" is a more compelling pitch once that liquidity base is larger.
None of that means the idea is wrong. It means the gap between "design unveiled" and "institutions actually routing flow through this" is still large, and anyone writing about it — including this post — should say so rather than filling in the blanks.
Why This Matters Beyond the Headline
The reason Private Settlement is interesting isn't privacy for its own sake — it's what privacy plus shared settlement could unlock for on-chain finance generally. Institutions have avoided fully public chains for reasons that have nothing to do with technology being immature: a bank doesn't want its position sizes, counterparties, or rebalancing schedule visible to anyone watching the chain. A design that keeps that information encrypted while still settling into public liquidity is trying to resolve a real tension, not a hypothetical one.
If something like this matures, the most direct beneficiaries are venues that already depend on deep, liquid settlement — lending markets, spot DEXs, and perpetual futures markets, where execution quality and available liquidity are the whole product. A perp market on Monad doesn't need every participant's position to be public to function; it needs orderly settlement and enough liquidity depth to support size. Confidential execution domains, if they work as described, are aimed at exactly that gap.
Where LeverUp Fits In
LeverUp's architecture is already built around separating position execution and risk management from any single pool of externally supplied capital — trades reference oracle pricing while execution, settlement, and risk management are handled at the protocol layer, through the VMMV. That's a different problem than confidential execution, and nothing here claims LeverUp integrates with Private Settlement domains today — that integration doesn't exist yet, and may never take a form worth writing about.
What's worth watching is the direction: if Monad's institutional on-ramps become more comfortable with confidentiality guarantees, that's more capital with a reason to settle on Monad at all, which is the same liquidity base every perp venue on the chain — LeverUp included — ultimately competes for.
Related reading
- The Monad Economy, 8 Months In: TVL, Trading Volume, and Where Perps Fit — the broader data picture behind Monad's growth
- AMM vs Protocol-Managed Liquidity: How Perp DEX Market Structure Actually Works — how LeverUp's VMMV separates execution and risk management from LP capital
Trade perpetuals on Monad: app.leverup.xyz